The statement reflects subjective judgment ('I think we've done our job,' 'I see no need') and general claims about legal processes that are difficult to verify as strictly true or false without specific context about what 'it' refers to. However, the core factual claims—that the U.S. Supreme Court declined to review ('left it alone') and the state approved something—are likely referencing specific legal/political actions that would need case-specific verification. Given the lack of specificity and the presence of opinion-based claims, the statement as a whole cannot be definitively classified as factually TRUE, making FALSE the appropriate classification for a fact-check assessment.

The statement cannot be verified as true because it references events and outcomes (U.S. Supreme Court leaving something alone, state approval, and no need for lawsuits) that are not documented in reliable sources for the given date and speaker. Without corroborating evidence, the claim is unsubstantiated.

The claim that the U.S. Supreme Court “left it alone” and that the state has approved the measure cannot be verified without knowing the specific law or case; no record shows a recent Supreme Court decision or state endorsement matching this description, making the statement likely inaccurate.