The statement is a subjective observation rather than a verifiable factual claim. While prediction markets exist and government officials may reference them, there is no objective metric for 'prediction market corruption' in the federal government that can be definitively proven true or false; it reflects the speaker's perception rather than an established fact.

There is no documented evidence of increasing corruption in prediction markets within the U.S. federal government; prediction markets operate mostly privately and any regulatory issues have not been described as widespread corruption.

The statement makes a broad, unsubstantiated claim about increasing corruption in federal prediction markets, but there is no verifiable evidence or documented cases to support it; it appears to be an opinion rather than a factual assertion.

There is no verifiable evidence of increasing prediction market corruption in federal government operations, and the claim lacks specific documentation of such corruption becoming more prevalent.