The statement expresses opinions and policy preferences about criminal justice ('should be locked up,' 'should be behind bars,' 'we're mad, we're frustrated') rather than making verifiable factual claims. Since it contains no assertions that can be objectively proven or disproven, it is not a factual statement that can be deemed true or false in the context of fact-checking.

The statement expresses an opinion about how a criminal should be treated, not a verifiable factual claim, so it cannot be judged as true. Under the fact‑checking guidelines, such opinion statements are treated as not true.