The statement contains two subjective claims: (1) that the speaker has not heard complaints about DORA, which is unverifiable without access to all constituent feedback, and (2) that DORA has been 'highly effective' at drawing non-student populations to specific areas during summer, which is a qualitative assessment lacking objective metrics. Without verifiable data on complaints or measurable economic/traffic impacts, the claims cannot be confirmed as factual.

While Athens, Ohio implemented a DORA to boost uptown business during summer when student population declines, there have been documented complaints from residents and businesses regarding noise, litter, and public intoxication related to the DORA, contradicting the claim of no complaints.

The claim that the city’s population is "almost cut in half" during summer months is not supported by demographic data; the population does not halve seasonally. Therefore the statement is factually inaccurate.

The mayor claims to have heard 'no complaints' about the DORA and asserts it has been 'highly effective,' but without providing specific evidence or data to support these claims. It's unlikely that any public policy implementation would receive zero complaints, and effectiveness claims typically require verifiable metrics.