The statement is a subjective opinion that something is "a better way to vote" across multiple measures, not an objective factual claim that can be definitively proven true or false. Without knowing what specific voting method Hickenlooper was referring to (the source context is incomplete), and given that claims about cost, turnout, and security depend on specific comparative contexts and empirical evidence that may vary by jurisdiction, this cannot be verified as a straightforward factual truth.

The statement asserts an absolute superiority ('by any measure') of a voting method across cost, turnout, and security, which is not universally true; there are scenarios and evidence where alternative methods may perform worse on at least one of these metrics.

The quote is a direct attribution to Senator John Hickenlooper reported by the cited source; there is no evidence contradicting that he made this statement.

The statement is dated in the future (2026-04-30), making its authenticity questionable. Additionally, the claim that voting is 'better by any measure' is subjective and absolute, as different voting methods have trade-offs in cost, turnout, and security that vary based on perspective and context.